diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 747d42e..912502d 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
 # *.pdf
 
 ## Generated if empty string is given at "Please type another file name for output:"
-.pdf
+*.pdf
 
 ## Bibliography auxiliary files (bibtex/biblatex/biber):
 *.bbl
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ acs-*.bib
 *.sls
 
 # uncomment this for glossaries-extra (will ignore makeindex's style files!)
-# *.ist
+*.ist
 
 # gnuplot
 *.gnuplot
diff --git a/Homework_Lesson_11.tex b/Homework_Lesson_11.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c852a4e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Homework_Lesson_11.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+\documentclass[a4paper, 12pt, english]{article}
+
+\usepackage[
+    headsep = 25pt
+]{geometry}
+
+\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
+\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
+\usepackage{listings}
+\usepackage{xcolor}
+\usepackage{hyperref}
+\usepackage{multicol}
+\usepackage{setspace}
+\usepackage{graphicx}
+\usepackage[acronym]{glossaries-extra}
+
+\usepackage{enumitem}
+\setlist{nosep}
+
+
+\title{Advanced Operating Systems\\Assignment Week 11}
+\author{Paul Lödige \\ Student ID: 37-229753}
+
+\makeatletter
+\newcommand*{\toccontents}{\@starttoc{toc}}
+\makeatother
+
+% acronyms
+\makeglossaries
+\newacronym{EDCL}{EDCL}{Earliest Deadline Critical Laxity}
+\newacronym{EDF}{EDF}{Earliest Deadline First}
+\newacronym{EDFWM}{EDF-WM}{\glsxtrlong{EDF} with Windowconstraint Mitigation}
+\newacronym{EDZL}{EDZL}{Earliest Deadline Zero Laxity}
+
+\begin{document}
+\maketitle
+\toccontents
+
+\printglossaries
+
+\section{Assignment}%
+\label{sec:Assignment}
+Summarize the \gls{EDCL} algorithm and the \gls{EDFWM} algorithm within 400 words, respectively,
+as compared to the traditional \gls{EDF} algorithm.
+\clearpage
+
+\section{\texorpdfstring{\glsxtrfull{EDCL}}{EDCL}}
+\label{EDCL}
+The \gls{EDCL} algorithm is a derivative of the \gls{EDZL} algorithm which in turn is a modified version of the \gls{EDF} algorithm.
+Because of Dhall's effect the \gls{EDF} algorithm is non-optimal for scheduling in a multiprocessor environment.
+\gls{EDZL} fixes Dhall's effect by promoting any task to the highest priority when its laxity reaches zero.
+In order for this to work the scheduler has to use a precise timer in order to detect the moment when any laxity reaches zero.
+\gls{EDCL} foregoes the need for this precise timer by only checking the laxity at the release time or the completion time of any task.
+At this moment the scheduler calculates whether any unscheduled task has a laxity that is critical.
+The \gls{EDCL} algorithm defines a task's laxity as critical 
+if the minimal remaining execution time of the tasks with the closest deadline would not allow the unscheduled task to hold its deadline.
+In this case,
+the task with the critical laxity is promoted to top priority.\\
+\textbf{Pros}
+\begin{itemize}
+    \item Dhall's effect does not apply (better than \gls{EDF})
+    \item easier to implement than \gls{EDZL} while being comparable in schedulability
+\end{itemize}
+\textbf{Cons}
+\begin{itemize}
+    \item non-optimal scheduling (worst-case processor utilization of 50\%)
+\end{itemize}
+
+\section{\texorpdfstring{\glsxtrfull{EDFWM}}{EDF-WM}}
+\label{EDFWM}
+The \gls{EDFWM} algorithms can be classified as a semi-partitioning scheduling algorithm
+because it schedules most tasks with a fixed processor assignment
+and only partitions as few tasks as possible.
+The algorithm is based on \gls{EDF} scheduling but avoids Dhall's effect.
+The algorithm assigns each new task to a specific processor
+as long as the deadline can be guaranteed by that processor.
+If the runtime of a new task is longer than the available the task is partitioned.
+Each partition is then scheduled on a different processor.
+The deadline of each partition relates to its position in the order of partitions.
+Additionally the \gls{EDFWM} algorithm only allows the scheduler to migrate each task once.
+This cuts down on the number of context switches while only slightly affecting its worst-case utilization.\\
+\textbf{Pros}%
+\begin{itemize}
+    \item Dhall's effect does not apply (better than \gls{EDF})
+    \item less context switching than other semi-partitioning scheduling algorithms
+\end{itemize}
+\textbf{Cons}%
+\begin{itemize}
+    \item non-optimal scheduling
+\end{itemize}
+
+
+\end{document}
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index cdf9a3d..3b6e7a0 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -1,2 +1,4 @@
 # Homework_Lesson_11
 
+## Assignment
+Summarize the EDCL algorithm and the EDF-WM algorithm within 400 words, respectively, as compared to the traditional EDF algorithm.